![]() The closest setting to the worldwide average is a 5200K white point. Just looking at a monitor with these defaults and then outside on a sunny day tells you immediately the monitor's color response is unnatural. The world does not look like a bright blue. That's why you need a hardware product.ĭon't even think of using the highly idiotic defaults of a 6500K white point and 2.2 gamma. The OS still has no clue what your monitor is actually displaying. Any such adjustment by eye is no better than not doing it at all. It's literally impossible to match monitors betweens Macs, or a combination of Macs and Windows with the built-in Calibration function because you can only do an eyeball adjusted calibration. This is an outdated colorimeter design that can't handle wide gamut monitors very well. Your goal is to use a hardware/software calibration and profiling solution such as the mentioned ColorMunki, or the i1 Display Pro and set them all to the same white point, gamma and brightness.ĭon't even consider the cheap ColorMunki Smile. ![]() A cheap monitor won't be able to display as wide a gamut as a more expensive one simply because its colorants are incapable of reproducing as much saturation as a more expensive model. The only thing preventing a user from getting multiple monitors to match perfectly are the monitors themselves. Such as, how much of Lab can this printer reproduce? That gamut and color range is the RGB profile for that printer, with that particular paper. Everything is referenced to CIE Lab, which is all color the human eye can discern described as a fixed mathematical model.It's actually kind of simple, and goes like this: The is the base, fixed color reference for all color matching whether you're talking about a monitor, printer, digital camera, digital projector, or any other device that can be profiled. Every OS displays color based on the CIE Lab color model.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |